Reports & Research

ZestyAI Product Insights

Winter Storm Fern has evolved into a historic catastrophe for the U.S. insurance industry. Between January 23-27, 2026, the storm shattered records by placing over 230 million Americans under severe winter alerts, with a death toll of 85 as of February 3rd. 

Preliminary industry estimates place insured losses at $6.7 billion, potentially making Fern the third-costliest U.S. winter storm on record, trailing Elliott (2022) and Uri (2021). The crisis is far from over. The National Weather Service warns of a "historic duration" of extreme cold, with temperatures 15 to 25 degrees below average, that continues to hamper mitigation efforts.

For carriers, Fern is a complex, multi-peril challenge. Claims teams are navigating a surge of freeze-related losses, ice-driven structural damage, and widespread business interruptions across 34 states. 

To understand the stakes, one needs to look no further than February 2021, when Winter Storm Uri brought Texas to its knees and generated over $11 billion in insured losses from a single state. Fern’s footprint is broader, and its secondary effects are still unfolding.

The Cold Hard Numbers from Storm Uri: Why Claims Explode Below 5°F

Our analysis of the 2021 Storm Uri reveals a striking relationship between temperature deviation and claim frequency for the non-weather water and freeze perils. Using data from multiple carriers, we tracked daily claim rates against minimum temperatures: before, during, and after the storm window (February 11-20, 2021).

The results show how rapidly falling temperatures can transform a routine winter pattern into a systemic loss event, allowing us to monitor the market’s response in real-time as conditions deteriorated, peaked, and normalized.

The results are dramatic:

‍

Figure 1: Daily claim rates (blue line) surged 126X above the baseline in a temporal spike as temperatures (orange line) plunged below the 20-year average (dashed green line) during Winter Storm Uri.

The chart reveals a clear inverse relationship: as minimum temperatures dropped from the mid-40s°F to below 5°F, daily claim rates didn’t just rise, they increased 126X, from a baseline of 0.04% to 0.46% at the peak. This dramatic surge underscores the significant consequences of extreme cold events on insurance liability.

Figure 2: ZestyAI’s Z-WATER™ demonstrated an 11X increase in claim frequency between ‘Very High’ and ‘Very Low’ risk tiers during Winter Storm Uri

We used ZestyAI’s Z-WATER™ to segment the property-specific non-weather water risk across the 10-day storm window. Z-WATER™ is a risk model that accounts for how plumbing design, local climate, and infrastructure reliability interact to drive non-weather water and freeze losses. By capturing real-world dynamics, such as temperature swings that stress pipes and electrical grid failures that amplify claims, the model delivers a scientifically grounded view of property-level risk.

The results were definitive: properties that Z-WATER™ scored as ‘Very High’ risk filed 26 claims per 1,000, compared to just 2.2 claims per 1,000 for those scored as ‘Very Low’, an 11X increase in claim frequency.

This accurate segmentation reveals a clear path to managing volatility. Z-WATER™ provides a deep understanding of a home’s resilience across the full spectrum of loss mechanisms, from everyday plumbing failures to expensive outlier events like Storms Uri and Fern. By enabling precise intra-territory risk splitting, the model allows carriers to price and underwrite more reliably, ensuring premiums reflect the true risk profile while protecting the portfolio against systemic losses.

The January 2026 Storm: History Rhyming?

While we can already see the immediate impact of Winter Storm Fern, the primary difference between Fern and Winter Storm Uri is the duration of the freezing event itself, rather than any changes in how quickly policyholders are filing their claims.

As shown in Figure 1, NWW claims rise rapidly as temperatures fall and taper off quickly once conditions normalize. The risk in prolonged cold events lies in how long properties stay below the Plumbing Design Temperature; the longer the freeze, the greater the likelihood of systemic plumbing failure.

During Winter Storm Uri, extended sub-freezing conditions significantly increased the number of days in which vulnerable properties were exposed to frozen pipe failures, driving aggregate losses to historic levels. Fern is now exhibiting a similar duration profile, with sub-freezing conditions persisting for up to 10 consecutive days across parts of the Northeast. The National Weather Service has warned this “could be the longest duration of cold in several decades,” raising the likelihood of elevated losses even if individual claims remain tightly clustered in time.

For carriers, the warning signs are already flashing:

• The Power Failure Multiplier: During the storm's peak, over 1 million customers lost power. In the South, where homes lack the heavy thermal insulation of northern properties, a power outage is the primary driver of catastrophic pipe bursts. Without active heating, a property can reach the "burst threshold" within hours.
• The $30,000 Claim Severity Benchmark: Recent State Farm data underscores the high stakes of these events. Winter water damage claims totaled over $628 million, with the average claim payment now exceeding $30,000. For carriers, this high per-claim severity means even a moderate frequency surge can quickly erode Q1 margins.
• Regional Fragility in the South: While the initial assessments are still surfacing, early industry estimates for privately insured losses from Winter Storm Fern puts the damage at $4 billion to $7 billion. With Texas and Tennessee identified as the hardest-hit states, carriers are facing a "Uri-style" scenario in which infrastructure wasn't designed for a 10-day deep freeze.

From Reactive to Predictive: Solving the $6.7 Billion Freeze Risk Equation

The 2021 Texas freeze taught us that traditional approaches to freeze risk are highly insufficient. Many properties that experienced burst pipes were in areas that rarely see extended freezing temperatures, meaning they lacked adequate winterization. 

This is where predictive analytics becomes essential. By modelling the interaction between property-level vulnerabilities and local temperature thresholds, carriers can better identify which properties are most vulnerable to freeze events before the damage actually occurs.

Key Risk Drivers Identified in Our Latest Analysis:

• The Design Mismatch: The greatest risk isn't just the cold; it's the sudden change in temperature. Properties in states like Texas or Tennessee face a higher risk because they are built to release heat, not trap it. They lack the heavy insulation and deep-buried pipes needed to survive a 10-day freeze.

• The Power Grid Vulnerability: Our analysis shows that areas prone to power outages face a compounded risk. In the South, a home’s primary defense is its heating system so when the power fails and the heater stops, the "burst threshold" can be reached in just a few hours.

• Building Vulnerabilities: Our analysis shows that older homes and properties with plumbing routed through exterior walls are disproportionately represented among $30,000 non-weather water losses.

The Bottom Line for Carriers

The 2021 Texas freeze was a pivotal moment for the industry, generating more than 500,000 claims and $11.2 billion in insured losses in a single state. Today, Winter Storm Fern represents an even broader systemic threat, with weather alerts impacting 230 million people across more than 30 states.

While the final tally for Fern is still developing, the data is already clear: temperature shocks drive claims at exponential rates. With early industry assessments estimating privately insured losses between $4 billion and $7 billion, it is evident that the prolonged duration and geographic anomaly of extreme weather events are the primary drivers of this volatility.

For carriers looking to protect their Q1 margins, predictive analytics are no longer a luxury; they are a requirement. By analyzing property-level characteristics, regional vulnerabilities, and historical temperature deviations, you can move from reactive claims handling to proactive risk management. 

The question isn't whether another major freeze will occur, but whether your portfolio is prepared for the next 126-fold surge.

Learn More About Z-WATER 

ZestyAI’s Z-WATER™ provides the industry’s most granular view of interior water risk, helping carriers accurately and reliably assess properties in areas prone to temperature shock events. By analyzing detailed property-level characteristics alongside historical weather patterns and regional risk factors, our advanced models predict the likelihood of Non-Weather Water (NWW) and freeze claims as well as their associated severity. This deeper level of analysis empowers carriers to make smarter pricing decisions before the next major storm hits.

Methodology: Analysis based on aggregated claims from multiple Texas carriers during Winter Storm Uri (February 2021). Temperature data reflects mean daily minimums across the exposure footprint, weighted by ZIP Code to account for geographic density. The claim/exposure ratio was calculated by dividing daily claims by the average policy-day exposure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

¹CNN Weather, "More than 230 million people under alerts for potential ice, heavy snow and extreme cold," January 2026. [link]

²Fox News, "Noem coordinates with Mississippi officials as state recovers from deadly winter storm," January 2026. [link] 

³Insurance Innovation Reporter, “KCC Estimates $6.7 Billion in Insured Losses from Winter Storm Fern,“ February 2026 [link]

⁴Texas Department of Insurance, "Insured Losses Resulting from the February 2021 Texas Winter Weather Event," March 2022. [link]

 ⁵Fox Business, “More than 1 million Americans lose power as monster winter storm sweeps across the US,” January 2025 [link]

 ⁶Carrier Management, “Frozen Pipes Lead to $628M in Losses for State Farm,” January, 2026 [link]

⁷ Barrons, “Winter Storm Fern Packed a Wallop. Now the Cost Estimates Are Rolling In.,“ February 2026 [link]

‍

Wildfire risk in the United States is no longer confined to the edges of forests or traditionally high-risk zones. New analysis using ZestyAI’s property-level wildfire models shows that millions of homes classified as low or no wildfire risk under federal assessments face elevated wildfire danger when evaluated at the property level.

This analysis was recently featured in Vox, which examined how wildfire behavior is evolving — and why broad, backward-looking risk maps are increasingly misaligned with how fires spread today.

👉 Read the full article on Vox → https://www.vox.com/climate/476932/california-wildfire-los-angeles-risk-ai-housing-climate

Wildfire risk is closer — and more granular — than most maps show

Many homes damaged or destroyed in the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires were still classified as “low risk” under federal wildfire assessments. ZestyAI’s property-level analysis provides a different perspective.

By evaluating individual structures — including vegetation proximity, defensible space, building characteristics, and neighborhood-level fire dynamics — ZestyAI identified more than 3,000 properties worth approximately $2.4 billion in areas impacted by the Palisades and Eaton fires that showed elevated wildfire risk despite being classified as low or no risk under FEMA’s census-level assessments.

Across California, the classification gap is even broader. Approximately 1.2 million properties, representing roughly $940 billion in residential property value, are designated as low or no wildfire risk under federal maps, despite AI-driven property-level models indicating elevated wildfire danger.

Why census-level wildfire maps fall short

Wildfires do not spread evenly across census tracts or counties. Ember-driven ignition, structure-to-structure spread, wind conditions, and localized vegetation patterns create uneven outcomes, where one home survives and the next is destroyed.

Federal wildfire assessments are designed to provide a baseline view of community-level risk. FEMA has noted that its National Risk Index is not intended to serve as a property-specific risk assessment. When risk is evaluated at the individual property level, meaningful differences emerge that aggregated maps are not designed to capture.

What more granular wildfire risk intelligence enables

More detailed wildfire risk data can support:

• Targeted mitigation efforts at the property and neighborhood level
• More informed rebuilding and land-use decisions
• Clearer, more defensible underwriting and portfolio strategies
• Improved dialogue between insurers, regulators, and communities

A shift in how wildfire risk is understood

Wildfire risk is evolving faster than the systems built to measure it. Homes are no longer just adjacent to wildfire hazards; they increasingly influence how fires ignite, spread, and intensify, even in dense urban environments.

Property-level risk intelligence does not remove hard decisions. But without it, those decisions are made using an incomplete picture of where wildfire risk truly exists.

Read the full Vox article here.

In property insurance, roof age is one of the most critical factors in assessing risk. Yet too often, carriers rely on self-reported or agent-supplied data that is incomplete or inaccurate.

ZestyAI’s recent analysis of 500,000+ properties revealed widespread discrepancies in reported roof age. The result? Mispriced policies, unexpected losses, and operational inefficiencies that impact the bottom line.

As climate volatility grows and reinsurance pressure intensifies, overlooking the true condition and age of a home’s largest, most exposed surface is a risk no carrier can afford.

What’s Inside

• Uncover the biggest myths and blind spots in roof age records.
• Understand why traditional data sources, like claims systems and permits, fall short in providing accurate roof age.
• Learn how a multi-source verification strategy, combining aerial imagery, permits, tax records, and AI, offers a blueprint for improvement and 97% national coverage.
• Explore why roof age is a predictor of losses across multiple perils, not just wind and hail.
• Discover the one-two punch of verified roof age and real-time condition insights, delivering a complete view of risk, even for young roofs with hidden problems.
• Align your roof age data with growing regulatory expectations, particularly in states like Florida.

Access the Guide.

New research from ZestyAI reveals that 62% of U.S. homeowners are deferring critical home maintenance, adding up to $317 billion in potential claims exposure for insurers.

These findings come as Severe Convective Storms (SCS) caused an estimated $58 billion in insured losses in 2024, surpassing hurricane-related losses and marking the second-costliest SCS year on record.

Tornadoes, hail, and wind events now account for over 60% of all U.S. catastrophe claims, and research from the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS) shows that roof damage accounts for up to 90% of residential catastrophe losses.

Key Findings from ZestyAI’s Homeowner Survey

According to ZestyAI’s nationally representative survey, 62% of homeowners have delayed essential repairs due to budget constraints, representing nearly 59 million U.S. homes with unaddressed vulnerabilities. Forty percent said they would rely on an insurance claim to cover major repairs like roof replacement, adding up to an estimated $317 billion in potential exposure for carriers.

Alarmingly, 63% of homeowners who weren’t living in their home at the time of the last roof replacement don’t know how old their roof is, making it even harder to detect aging systems before they fail. Meanwhile, 12% admitted they would delay repairs indefinitely, further increasing their risk of property damage.

Severe Convective Storms: The Growing Catastrophe Risk

This blind spot compounds known risks: prior ZestyAI analysis has identified over 12.6 million U.S. properties at high risk for hail-related roof damage, representing $189.5 billion in potential roof replacement costs.

“Deferred maintenance has long been a known risk factor, but today the stakes are higher than ever,” said Kumar Dhuvur, Co-Founder and Chief Product Officer of ZestyAI. "With claim severity rising and storm losses compounding, insurers need more than hazard maps to navigate this landscape."

"Property-level insights allow carriers to proactively address known vulnerabilities, improve underwriting precision, and work with homeowners to reduce losses before they happen.”

ZestyAI’s findings support a growing push toward data-driven, preventative underwriting strategies, especially as carriers face rising claim severity and pressure to improve combined ratios across storm-prone states.

With insured losses projected to exceed $30 billion, the recent Los Angeles wildfires rank among the costliest in U.S. history—reshaping how insurers think about risk, resilience, and readiness.

Watch the Full Webinar → LA Fires in Focus: What Insurers Need to Know

In this on-demand webinar, experts from the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS), the Western Fire Chiefs Association, Cal Poly’s WUI Fire Institute, and ZestyAI unpack what really happened—from frontline response to lab-based research and model performance—and share critical strategies insurers can use to prepare for what’s next.

Watch this session if you’re a Product Managers, Underwriters, Actuaries, and Risk & Innovation leaders looking to make informed decisions in an increasingly volatile wildfire landscape.

What You’ll Learn

• Key takeaways from the Los Angeles wildfires
• Research on structure-to-structure fire spread and resilience factors
• How wildfire risk models performed—what we got right (and wrong)
• Practical strategies to reduce exposure and strengthen resilience

Meet the Experts

• Anne Cope, Chief Engineer, IBHS
• Bob Roper, CEO, Western Fire Chiefs Association
• Frank Frievalt, Director, WUI Fire Institute at Cal Poly
• Kumar Duhvur, Co-Founder & CPO, ZestyAI

With insured losses projected to exceed $30 billion, the recent Los Angeles wildfires rank among the costliest in U.S. history—reshaping how insurers think about risk, resilience, and readiness.

Watch the Full Webinar → LA Fires in Focus: What Insurers Need to Know

In this on-demand webinar, experts from the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS), the Western Fire Chiefs Association, Cal Poly’s WUI Fire Institute, and ZestyAI unpack what really happened—from frontline response to lab-based research and model performance—and share critical strategies insurers can use to prepare for what’s next.

Watch this session if you’re a Product Managers, Underwriters, Actuaries, and Risk & Innovation leaders looking to make informed decisions in an increasingly volatile wildfire landscape.

What You’ll Learn

• Key takeaways from the Los Angeles wildfires
• Research on structure-to-structure fire spread and resilience factors
• How wildfire risk models performed—what we got right (and wrong)
• Practical strategies to reduce exposure and strengthen resilience

Meet the Experts

• Anne Cope, Chief Engineer, IBHS
• Bob Roper, CEO, Western Fire Chiefs Association
• Frank Frievalt, Director, WUI Fire Institute at Cal Poly
• Kumar Duhvur, Co-Founder & CPO, ZestyAI

DUAL North America Inc.’s (“DUAL”) personal property division has selected ZestyAI’s Z-STORM™ model to enhance storm-risk underwriting and pricing as it continues its rapid US expansion.

The partnership equips DUAL with sharper risk differentiation, more accurate underwriting and pricing, and a stronger foundation for sustainable growth in regions increasingly affected by severe convective storms.

By adopting ZestyAI’s severe convective storm model, DUAL will strengthen its ability to identify and price the combined effects of hail and wind with greater precision. This will enable faster, more informed decisions and profitable expansion while maintaining regulatory compliance.

The collaboration reflects DUAL’s continued investment in advanced analytics and technology to support long-term growth.

The specialty program administrator, offering more than 40 insurance products and surpassing $1.3 billion in gross written premium in 2024, continues to broaden its capabilities across commercial, specialty, and personal lines.

Luke Wolmer, Chief Actuary at DUAL, said:

“As we continue to grow across personal property lines, having accurate risk prediction at the property level is crucial."

Z-STORM gives us a more nuanced understanding of storm vulnerability, helping us recognize differences in risk that traditional models overlook. This enhances our team’s confidence in pricing decisions and will support our continued expansion across the U.S.”

Z-STORM is an AI-powered risk model that evaluates the combined effects of hail and wind to predict the frequency and severity of storm-related damage at the property level. By analyzing the interaction between local climatology and the unique characteristics of every structure—including roof condition, material, and surrounding exposure—the model delivers precise, property-specific insights into storm vulnerability.

In September 2025, ZestyAI introduced mitigation-aware scoring to its severe convective storm suite, allowing insurers to dynamically adjust risk scores to reflect verified improvements such as roof replacements, upgraded materials, or corrected property data. This enhancement gives carriers a scalable way to recognize mitigation within pricing and underwriting workflows, advancing transparency and regulatory alignment.

Attila Toth, Founder and CEO of ZestyAI, said:

“DUAL’s adoption of Z-STORM reflects a forward-thinking approach to storm risk management."

"By applying property-level risk analytics and mitigation-aware scoring, DUAL is positioned to underwrite more precisely, grow responsibly, and strengthen community resilience across the regions that are most exposed to extreme weather”.

ZestyAI’s storm models are regulatory reviewed and ready to use across the Great Plains, Midwest, and U.S. South, regions most impacted by severe convective storms, and are actively used by carriers for rating and underwriting.

ZestyAI today announced the expansion of ZORRO Discover™ to all property and casualty insurance lines.

ZORRO Discover analyzes millions of state filings to surface real-time regulatory and market intelligence, giving carriers actionable insights to make faster, more confident decisions. Carriers using the platform have reduced adverse selection, accelerated regulatory approvals by up to 50%, and expanded analytical capacity more than 20-fold—turning what was once a manual, fragmented process into a source of strategic advantage.

The platform now delivers unified visibility across all P&C lines, including Commercial Auto and Property, Personal Auto and Property, Financial and Specialty Lines, Liability and Professional Lines, Workers’ Compensation, and Administrative filings—covering every major filing type across the United States.

Built on ZestyAI’s Agentic AI platform, ZORRO Discover scales decision intelligence across the insurance industry, transforming over a decade of U.S. insurance filings into a single, transparent system of insight. Carriers can instantly benchmark competitors, analyze rating trends, and anticipate regulator feedback and objections in real time, turning regulatory filings from a compliance requirement into a strategic advantage.

Kumar Dhuvur, Chief Product Officer and Co-Founder at ZestyAI, said:

“Every corner of P&C faces the same challenge: too many filings and too little time. Now, whether it’s workers’ comp in Texas or commercial auto in California, teams can simply ask ZORRO and get instant, verified insights in real time.”

By analyzing past objections and outcomes, teams can anticipate regulators’ questions before they arise and move filings forward with precision. Live monitoring of new submissions keeps organizations current on competitor moves and market shifts, turning what was once a fragmented, manual workflow into a real-time decision system that helps teams act quickly and strategically.

With its conversational interface, users can simply ask ZORRO to surface insights that once took hours or days to uncover. Product, actuarial, and regulatory teams can now collaborate from a single, auditable source of truth, replacing manual searches and static spreadsheets with transparent, explainable intelligence that drives faster, smarter action.

ZORRO Discover is available now for all property and casualty insurance lines.

Start your trial.

‍

At ZestyAI, we know that better data leads to better decisions. That’s why we’ve invested in a major upgrade to our Roof Age product, trusted by leading carriers to improve risk selection, pricing, and operational efficiency in property insurance.

Today, we’re excited to share what’s new, what’s improved, and how these advancements are already helping carriers strengthen underwriting, rating, and inspection workflows.

What’s New in Roof Age

We’ve taken a holistic approach to improving performance, accuracy, and efficiency. Here’s what you’ll find in the latest release:

Refit model with double the training data

We’ve significantly enhanced the Roof Age model, doubling the size of our training dataset to improve performance across diverse housing stock, roof types, and geographies.

This expanded dataset incorporates more confirmed roof replacement events and broader regional variation, allowing the model to generalize more effectively to different parts of the country, including historically underrepresented regions.

The model is now better able to distinguish between full roof replacements and other types of roof-related activity, such as solar panel installation, patched sections, partial replacements, or home additions.

These events may alter the roof’s appearance or condition, but don’t represent a comprehensive replacement. By learning the subtle visual and contextual cues that separate these scenarios, the model delivers more accurate predictions and reduces the risk of misclassification.

Enhanced estimation for challenging cases

In cases where no building permit is available and roof replacement can’t be clearly confirmed via aerial imagery, our improved Roof Age Estimation Model takes over. This model, now trained on double the dataset, is purpose-built for ambiguity.

It leverages not only imagery and property-level features but also regional climatology, using knowledge of local weather patterns and environmental stressors to inform its estimate.

For example, a roof in the Southeast exposed to intense sun and humidity will age differently than one in the Pacific Northwest or Upper Midwest. Incorporating these regional factors helps improve estimation accuracy, even when direct replacement signals are unavailable.

ZestyAI also establishes a minimum roof age, providing additional clarity and confidence. Using our extensive, 20-year aerial imagery catalog, we can identify the earliest visual evidence of the current roof.

If no replacement activity is detected over a known span of time, we can confidently assert that the roof is at least that old.

This minimum age is then used not just as a floor, but as a valuable input to further refine the overall roof age estimate, narrowing the prediction with greater precision than models limited to single-source or snapshot data.

This capability provides underwriters and actuaries with a powerful, high-confidence signal, particularly valuable for pricing segmentation, inspection prioritization, and risk selection strategies.

Intelligent cross-validation logic

The model doesn’t rely on a single data source. Even when a strong signal like a building permit is available, it cross-validates with high-resolution aerial imagery to detect inconsistencies, like permits that were filed but not followed through, or replacements that occurred without permits.

This layered logic helps ensure predictions are grounded in current conditions, not just administrative records. It also improves detection of fraud, data entry errors, or outdated assumptions in property records.

This logic creates a "trust but verify" framework that boosts both precision and confidence in every prediction.

To illustrate, imagine a home built 12 years ago. The model begins by anchoring to the construction year, then scans forward through our aerial imagery catalog and permit records to assess whether a roof replacement has occurred.

By grounding the analysis in the property's timeline, the model avoids misinterpreting the original roof as a newer installation and increases confidence in identifying true replacement events.

Expanded imagery catalog

We’ve enriched our aerial imagery sources to improve roof verification across geographies. The result: more accurate verification of roof replacements and improved model performance in hard-to-cover geographies.

This helps carriers score more properties with higher confidence, especially in rural or previously under-covered regions.

Confidence scores for every prediction

Every Roof Age prediction now comes with a confidence score, helping carriers make more informed decisions. High-confidence predictions can be fast-tracked for automated processing, while lower-confidence scores can trigger secondary review or inspection.

This added transparency empowers carriers to make risk-based decisions not only on the prediction itself, but on how much to rely on it.

Improved Performance Behind the Scenes

We’ve also made significant infrastructure upgrades to enhance product speed and reliability.

• Reduced Latency: Infrastructure improvements have cut average response times to under 2.5 seconds per property, making Roof Age a real-time-ready solution for quoting and policy decisions.
• Stricter Quality Controls: We’ve added new safeguards to filter out imagery that’s blurry, outdated, or contains visual artifacts. Only high-resolution, high-confidence inputs are used to power predictions.
• Scalability: These backend improvements also allow us to handle larger portfolios with more concurrent requests. This is ideal for carriers integrating Roof Age into enterprise systems.

Easier Access for Every Workflow

Roof Age is available wherever you need it:

• In Z-VIEW: Easily visualize Roof Age predictions and supporting evidence with property-level insights directly in our web application.
• Via API: Seamlessly score entire portfolios and integrate directly into your quoting, pricing, or inspection strategies.

Ready to See the Results for Yourself?

The feedback from the market has been tremendous, and we’re just getting started. Want to see the results for yourself? We’re inviting carriers to pilot the new Roof Age model and evaluate its performance on their own book of business.

Get in touch to schedule your Roof Age pilot

ZestyAI announced that Brava Roof Tile, a leader in premium synthetic roofing solutions backed by Golden Gate Capital, has selected ZestyAI to validate the real-world performance of its roofing systems during past storms.

How Brava Roof Tile Uses ZestyAI’s Property and Roof Intelligence

Brava Roof Tile is leveraging three of ZestyAI’s proven solutions to bring greater clarity to roof performance and replacement opportunities. Roof Age synthesizes building permit data with 20+ years of high-resolution aerial imagery, applying advanced machine learning to deliver verified roof age estimates with 97% U.S. coverage.

Within Z-PROPERTY™, Digital Roof applies AI to assess roof complexity, materials, and condition, flagging vulnerabilities before they become costly failures, while Location Insights evaluates the broader parcel to surface risk factors such as vegetation overhang, yard debris, and secondary structure.

Together, these insights provide comprehensive coverage, unmatched accuracy, and fast deployment at scale, turning property-level data into actionable guidance on roof vulnerabilities and replacement opportunities.

Validating Real-World Resilience With Property-Level Data

“Brava is committed to helping homeowners protect their most valuable asset with roofs that combine durability, sustainability, and beauty,” said Matt Pronk, Chief Financial Officer of Brava Roof Tile.

“With ZestyAI, we gain a clear, data-driven view of how roofs perform in the real world and use those insights to guide families toward stronger, longer-lasting protection.”

“Brava Roof Tile is showing how ZestyAI's risk analytics can be applied to validate resilience in the real world,” said Attila Toth, Founder and CEO of ZestyAI.

“Our mission is to protect families, communities, and their financial wellbeing, and our unmatched coverage and accuracy make that possible at scale."

At ZestyAI, we’re often asked:
What Does “Property-Level” Mean? 
What Makes ZestyAI Different from Traditional Risk Models?
Are ZestyAI Models Approved for Use in Underwriting and Rating?

This post answers the most common questions we receive from underwriters, actuaries, regulators, and technology partners—using wildfire, hail, wind, water, and storm perils as examples of how we turn complex data into actionable insights.

What Does “Property-Level” Mean?

Traditional risk models often rely on ZIP codes, territories, or broad regional averages to assess hazard and vulnerability. Stochastic models may support property-specific analysis, but they typically require external data sources, which adds cost, complexity, and inconsistency.

At ZestyAI, we assess each structure based on its physical characteristics and how it interacts with the surrounding environment.

We assess:

• Parcel boundaries and building footprints
• High-resolution aerial and oblique imagery
• Topography, slope, and vegetation
• Structural details like roof shape, materials, and defensible space

By integrating climatology with the built environment, we generate contextual risk scores that capture how each property’s physical characteristics, regional climatology, and historical loss experience interact to shape real-world risk.

That drives smarter decisions in underwriting, pricing, and mitigation, without relying on assumptions or manually sourced data.

What Makes ZestyAI Different from Traditional Risk Models?

Traditional risk tools often rely on:

• Broad hazard zones that can’t distinguish risk within a ZIP code
• Infrequent model updates that fail to reflect current conditions
• Over-simplified proxies—often relying solely on factors like year built—without accounting for deeper structural nuance
• Manual inspections that are slow, inconsistent, and costly

ZestyAI takes a fundamentally different approach.

Our models:

• Use gradient boosted machines that capture complex interactions between property features and environmental conditions
• Are trained on millions of actual insurance claims, not simulations, ensuring outputs reflect real-world loss experience
• Leverage both imagery (e.g., high-resolution aerial and oblique photos) and non-imagery sources (e.g., permits, climatology, topography)
• Continuously incorporate new data to reflect changing exposures
• Provide parcel-level risk scores with full transparency and regulator-ready documentation

With 97%+ U.S. property coverage, ZestyAI delivers national models with localized precision, helping carriers segment risk, price accurately, and respond to today’s evolving climate risks.

Are ZestyAI Models Approved for Use in Underwriting and Rating?

Yes. ZestyAI’s models, including Z-FIRE™, Z-HAIL™, Z-WIND™, Z-WATER™, and Z-STORM™, have been approved for use in underwriting and rating across the U.S.

Our regulatory approach is grounded in a few key principles:

• Transparency: We provide clear, regulator-ready documentation, including model methodology, variable selection rationale, and statistical validation.
• Collaboration: We work directly with carriers and state regulators throughout the filing process, from pre-submission briefings to objections.
• Responsible Innovation: Our models are trained on real-world claims, regularly updated with new data, and built with fairness and explainability in mind.

We support filings with:

• Detailed methodology and input documentation
• Variable importance rankings and validation studies
• Pre-built regulatory summaries to streamline the review
• Ongoing support throughout the regulatory lifecycle

ZestyAI has a track record of success navigating regulatory review. We help carriers adopt cutting-edge risk models with confidence and compliance.

Roof Age vs. Roof Condition: What’s the Difference?

ZestyAI’s models distinguish between roof age and roof condition, treating them as complementary signals that together provide a more accurate picture of roof-related risk, especially for hail and wind.

Roof Age is validated using a combination of building permit data and aerial imagery, analyzed through multiple proprietary methods simultaneously. We assign confidence scores to each roof age and apply minimum roof age rules to avoid false positives, ensuring the data is robust, even in jurisdictions with limited permitting records.

Roof Condition is assessed through computer vision models applied to high-resolution aerial imagery. These models detect visual signs of degradation, such as discoloration, wear, patching, and debris, that may not correlate with official replacement dates.

Why does this matter?

Because many insurers rely solely on reported roof age, which is often missing, outdated, or self-reported.

Our approach captures:

• Properties with older roofs that are still in good shape (and may be lower risk)
• Properties with newer roofs already showing signs of wear (and may be higher risk)
• Up-to-date roof vulnerability that static datasets can’t match

Together, roof age and condition power smarter decisions in underwriting, pricing, and mitigation—grounded in observable reality, not assumptions.

Modeling Approach: Why Gradient-Boosted Machines (GBMs)?

ZestyAI's risk models use gradient boosted machines (GBMs), a machine learning technique that delivers powerful predictive performance while remaining transparent and regulator-ready.

We use GBMs because they:

• Achieve high predictive accuracy by combining many simple decision trees into an ensemble that learns from its own errors over time, ideal for capturing complex insurance risk signals.
• Model non-linear interactions between variables, such as how roof complexity, condition, and regional climatology jointly influence risk, something traditional models or GLMs often miss.
• Enable transparency and explainability, with tools like feature importance rankings, partial dependence plots, and SHAP values that help underwriters, actuaries, and regulators understand what’s driving risk scores.
• Support a wide range of input types, from imagery-derived features to structured data like permits, topography, and property characteristics, all in one unified framework.

The result: a modeling approach that delivers real-world impact, supporting smarter underwriting, better pricing, and confident regulatory adoption.

How Z-FIRE Evaluates Wildfire Risk

Z-FIRE is ZestyAI’s structure-level wildfire risk model, built to capture both traditional wildland fire exposure and the growing threat of urban conflagration. Unlike traditional hazard maps that apply uniform risk zones across ZIP codes or counties, Z-FIRE delivers granular, property-specific risk scores for every structure in the U.S.

The model includes two levels of scoring:

1. Level One: Exposure Risk – Evaluates how likely a structure is to fall within a future wildfire perimeter, based on vegetation, slope, elevation, proximity to the wildland-urban interface (WUI), historical burn patterns, and regional climatology.
2. Level Two: Structure Vulnerability – Assesses how likely that structure is to be damaged if a wildfire occurs nearby. This score factors in structural characteristics like building materials, defensible space, and surrounding fuels, extracted from aerial imagery using computer vision.

Together, these scores provide a more complete view of wildfire risk: not just where fires may happen, but how individual structures are likely to perform.

Z-FIRE also captures non-traditional wildfire scenarios, including embers and wind-driven fires that jump the WUI and ignite dense suburban and urban neighborhoods. This makes the model particularly valuable for identifying concentration risk, urban conflagration, and managing PML across books of business.

Z-FIRE is validated on millions of insurance claims and performs reliably across all geographies—from the forests of California and the grasslands of Texas to emerging risk zones in Colorado, Oregon, and the Eastern U.S.

How Z-HAIL Accounts for Roof Vulnerability

Z-HAIL is a property-specific hail risk model designed to assess not just the likelihood of hail, but how damaging it will be to a specific structure.

Unlike traditional models that rely on historical hail frequency alone, Z-HAIL captures the interaction between local climatology and structural resilience by analyzing:

• Hail climatology: storm frequency, hailstone size, and intensity at a hyperlocal level
• Roof geometry and materials: pitch, complexity, covering type, and other features that influence how hail impacts a roof
• Property-specific vulnerability factors: including building height, exposure, and roof condition (derived from imagery and computer vision)

By modeling how hail behaves in a given location and how a specific roof is likely to perform under those conditions, Z-HAIL delivers precise risk segmentation at the parcel level. 

Carriers using Z-HAIL have seen significant improvements in underwriting performance. In an independent third-party review, Z-HAIL demonstrated a 20× lift in loss ratio segmentation between high- and low-risk properties—enabling more accurate pricing, better risk selection, and actionable mitigation strategies.

How Z-WIND Analyzes Wind-Driven Damage

Z-WIND is a property-specific model that evaluates vulnerability to both straight-line winds and tornadic activity by analyzing how wind climatology interacts with structure-level characteristics.

The model captures:

• Roof geometry: including shape, pitch, and surface area, which influence uplift forces
• Building elevation: to assess exposure to wind at various heights
• Local terrain and land cover: which impact wind speed, turbulence, and exposure to flying debris
• Historical wind climatology: including storm frequency and intensity
• Real-world claims data: to ensure outputs reflect actual loss performance

Z-WIND generates property-level frequency and severity scores, helping insurers move beyond broad wind zones to more precisely identify risk at the structure level. By understanding how specific buildings respond to local wind conditions, Z-WIND enables more accurate pricing, underwriting, and mitigation strategies across both inland and coastal regions.

How Z-WATER Tackles Non-Weather Water Losses

Z-WATER is an AI-powered model that predicts the frequency and severity of non-weather water and freeze claims at the property level, covering every structure in the contiguous U.S. 

While many traditional models depend heavily on basic indicators such as “year built,” Z-WATER combines those inputs with a broader set of property, climate, and infrastructure features to capture the interaction between three core dimensions of risk:

• Construction & Architecture: Property-specific features that influence vulnerability and claim severity, such as number of bathrooms, number of stories, presence of a pool, and overhanging vegetation (a signal for potential tree root intrusion).
• Climatology: Environmental stressors like temperature swings and freeze/thaw cycles that contribute to pipe bursts and system strain.
• Local Infrastructure & Hydrology: How local plumbing systems and electrical grids perform when real-world cold snaps or heat waves exceed what regional codes anticipated, exposing systemic weak points that lead to burst pipes and interior water damage.

These variables are derived from aerial imagery, tax assessment data, and regional climate and infrastructure datasets, all processed through ZestyAI’s proprietary AI framework.

Z-WATER helps insurers:

• Set fair and adequate rates based on true exposure
• Target high-risk homes for mitigation (e.g., water sensors or shutoff valves)
• Streamline operations by automating low-risk decisions and focusing resources where they matter most

What Is Z-STORM?

Z-STORM is a predictive, property-specific model built for carriers that rate hail and wind as a combined peril. It provides structure-level risk scores across the contiguous U.S., enabling more accurate pricing, underwriting, and mitigation decisions.

Unlike traditional territory-based approaches, Z-STORM models how storm climatology interacts with the built environment—capturing the real-world conditions that drive loss at the individual property level.

The model incorporates:

• Storm climatology: frequency and severity of wind and hail events at a hyperlocal scale
• Structural features: roof shape, material, pitch, and condition—key factors in a structure’s vulnerability
• Environmental context: including open terrain and nearby vegetation, which can amplify damage

Z-STORM predicts both:

1. Claim frequency: the likelihood a property will experience a storm-related claim
2. Claim severity: the expected loss as a percentage of Coverage A, providing a more precise view of financial exposure

This dual prediction enables carriers to:

• Accurately rate combined wind and hail risk at the property level
• Target mitigation strategies (e.g., roof improvements that reduce exposure to both hazards)
• Improve risk segmentation and pricing

Z-STORM offers a single, AI-powered solution for capturing the true complexity of convective storm risk—from climate data to construction detail to expected loss outcome.

ZestyAI announced today a new partnership with California Casualty, a trusted auto and home insurance provider serving educators, police officers, firefighters, and healthcare workers for over 110 years.

The collaboration will enhance California Casualty’s wildfire underwriting and pricing capabilities while reinforcing its long-term commitment to serving California’s community heroes and supporting the California Department of Insurance’s Sustainable Insurance Strategy (SIS).

Enhancing Accuracy, Supporting Affordability

California Casualty will deploy ZestyAI’s Z-FIRE™ model and Wildfire Mitigation Pre-Fill to better align premiums with property-specific wildfire risk and recognize homeowners’ efforts to mitigate that risk.

These advanced models analyze each property’s vulnerability based on factors such as topography, vegetation, building materials, defensible space, and the characteristics of the built environment.

Unlike traditional models that stop at the wildland-urban interface, Z-FIRE accounts for the dynamics of urban conflagration, where fire spreads rapidly from structure to structure in densely built neighborhoods. Wildfire Mitigation Pre-Fill complements this by automatically surfacing mitigation features at scale, bringing greater accuracy and transparency to underwriting.

Todd Brickel, Senior Vice President, Chief Risk & Product Officer at California Casualty, said:

“As wildfire threats intensify, our responsibility is to ensure that educators, peace officers, firefighters, and healthcare professionals continue to have access to reliable and affordable coverage."

"Partnering with ZestyAI equips us with data-driven insights needed to price risk accurately, reward mitigation, and sustain our role as a long-term solution in California’s insurance market.”

Commitment to California

California Casualty has long stood with California’s community heroes, protecting their homes in both city neighborhoods and wildfire-exposed areas. Even as other insurers have reduced their footprint, California Casualty continues to expand access to coverage in support of Commissioner Ricardo Lara’s Sustainable Insurance Strategy.

Through its investment in advanced wildfire analytics, the company is ensuring that affordability and availability can coexist in California’s evolving insurance landscape.

The strength of Z-FIRE’s analytics was reaffirmed during the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires, when the Palisades and Eaton fires escalated into fast-moving urban conflagrations.

The model’s performance reinforced how advanced analytics can anticipate where fire risk is greatest and help insurers strengthen preparedness and resilience well before events occur.

These insights enable California Casualty to maintain confidence in providing coverage for community heroes throughout California’s most challenging environments.

Attila Toth, CEO of ZestyAI, said:

“We are proud to partner with California Casualty, a company that has served community heroes for more than a century.”

“Our AI-driven models provide the transparency, accuracy, and property-level detail needed for insurers to remain confident in challenging markets, rewarding mitigation efforts and supporting regulatory goals for long-term stability.”

Built and validated on more than 2,000 historical wildfire events and two decades of claims data, Z-FIRE has been widely adopted by insurers across the West and recognized by regulators for use in both underwriting and rating.