
For property insurers, roof age is more than just a data field — it’s a critical underwriting decision point that directly impacts pricing, risk selection, and loss costs. But what happens when that data is wrong two-thirds of the time?
A large U.S. carrier with over $500 million in direct written premium recently found out. Relying on self-reported and agent-estimated roof ages, they were systematically underpricing risky properties while overpricing safer ones. The result: adverse selection, elevated loss ratios, and underwriting decisions built on shaky foundations.
ZestyAI’s research shows that 67% of self-reported roof ages are inaccurate:
This isn’t just a pricing issue. Analysis also found that 78% of carriers in key U.S. regions use age-based triggers for ACV roof endorsements, with some starting as early as 8 years old. When roof age is wrong, policies can be misclassified across underwriting, eligibility, and coverage terms — creating compounding risk across the insurance lifecycle.
To replace guesswork with ground truth, the carrier deployed ZestyAI Roof Age, which analyzes building permits, more than 20 years of aerial imagery, and regional climatology using advanced machine learning. Each assessment is paired with a transparent confidence score.
Unlike traditional approaches that rely on policyholder memory or limited inspections, ZestyAI Roof Age:
The difference was immediate.
In one Denver property, the agent reported an 8-year-old roof. ZestyAI identified it as 10 years old, confirmed by aerial imagery showing the replacement event.
In a Baltimore case, what was reported as a 5-year-old roof was actually 21 years old — verified through imagery and permitting history.
These weren’t edge cases. They reflected a systemic pattern across the portfolio.
By integrating verified roof age into underwriting and pricing workflows, the carrier achieved a 1.71% reduction in combined ratio. The improvement came from three measurable levers:
Beyond loss ratios, better roof age data improved portfolio transparency, supported expansion into previously restricted markets, and strengthened actuarial and underwriting decision-making.
After proving the value of accurate roof age, the carrier is now building on that foundation. They are incorporating additional property attributes — including roof complexity, roof quality, and parcel-level features — through ZestyAI’s Z-PROPERTY™ platform.
By standardizing and elevating property data quality at scale, the carrier expects to unlock similar gains across quoting, underwriting, renewals, and even reinsurance discussions.
The takeaway is clear: in an industry built on precision, even a single data point — when made accurate — can deliver outsized impact.
Read the full Roof Age Accuracy case study to see how verified roof age drives measurable underwriting and pricing gains → From Self-Reported to Verified: Roof Age Accuracy That Pays Off